from early stage of mass production of new products. However, the problem was resolved at the end of the last year, therefore, this year’s gross profit was better than same period of last year
THB 38.63 million. This represents an effective tax rate of 39.95% which is higher than its statutory tax rate of 20.00% due mainly to deferred tax expense was recognized in the first half of 2019. Net
period of twenty years or more. Such employees are entitled to receive compensation of not less than 400 days at the employees’ latest wage rate according to The Labor Protection Act (No. 7) B.E. 2562. 3
was lower than sales growth rate reflecting from the higher gross profit margin. The gross profit in Q3/2019 was increased from Baht 60.4 million to be Baht 72.3 million or equivalent to 19.71
million, increased by THB 0.61 million or +4.39% YoY due to the increase in profit before income tax expense. However, the growth rate of income tax expense is lower than the growth rate of profit before
แบบแสดงรายการขอมูลการเสนอขายตราสารหน้ี (รายครั้ง) (แบบ 69-DEBT-PO-GOV.AGENCY) บริษัท........... (ช่ือไทย/อังกฤษของผูเสนอขายตราสารหน้ี) ............. เสนอขาย ......................................................................................................................... ......................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................
costs (if any). (2) In the case where the CIS operator no longer wishes to offer for sale the units of a collective investment scheme in Thailand, in case other than in connection with (1), at least three
to the public prosecutor for filing a lawsuit in the Civil Court to seek the maximum applicable civil sanctions, which shall not be lower than those specified by the CSC. In all cases, the civil
occasions. The SEC criminal complaints against these persons involved nine cases with the initial total damages of more than 200 million baht. The transactions related to the cases are summarized as follows
against EARTH for an unreasonably high amount of indebtedness, in order that EARTH’s indebtedness would be greater than its assets, despite the fact that they opined or were in a position to know that