situation and will be utmost benefit for the company in the future. However, IFA has an observation that AM?s service fee should be based on operating profit or net profit, and it should not be charged if GJS

profit in Q1/2009. The information was significantly different from the company's previous records showing profit in every quarter during the past three years (2007-2009) and thus considered material to

disclosing financial statements that showed profit and delayed disclosing bad news. In addition, the study found that if non-financial information or M&A decisions were revealed too early, share prices would

authorization from his client and made SBL trading decisions for the client when there was profit or risk with the client's account. He then informed his client via telephone with regard to the profit and loss on

) (29.70) (34.16) Administrative Expense (55.25) (66.00) (60.45) Total Expenses (73.59) (95.70) (94.61) Earnings before Finance Costs 21.22 78.98 102.16 Finance Costs (19.90) (27.68) (28.30) Net Profit 1.32

1.78 4.66 Profit before Expenses 94.81 174.68 196.77 Selling Expense (18.34) (29.70) (34.16) Administrative Expense (55.25) (66.00) (60.45) Total Expenses (73.59) (95.70) (94.61) Earnings before Finance

compared to same period of previous year as total other revenue of 49.96 Million Baht due to selling scrap of raw material, unrealized profit from investment and decline of interest 2 (2) Gross Profit

compared to a net profit of 18.45 million baht, is due to the following reasons: 1. The ailing economic condition especially in the automotive industry, in addition to a change in the company’s strategy to

profit for the six-month period ended 30 June 2017 was Baht 0.51 million. Compared to the same period of 2016, showed a loss of Baht 171.79 million.

auditor’s report and financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017 as follows: The company’s operating results for the year ended December 31,2017 has profit in the amount of 9.15 million baht