regulations. For example, they withdrew money from the clients' accounts and used it for other persons' unit purchases in absence of the accounts' owners, or executed unit purchase orders by charging the

the law*. The SEC, therefore, sanctioned the said four persons and the executive by suspension the approval and set the period of acceptance of their re-applications**.In this regard, the SEC warns

decisions on the clients? behalf were misconduct while Monta?s action was failure to perform her duty in compliance with the company?s rules*. The SEC, therefore, sanctioned the said four persons by

compliance with the company's rules*. The SEC, therefore, sanctioned the said four persons by suspending the approval and set the period of acceptance of their re-applications**.In this regard, the SEC warns

}, formerly a manager of Chonburi branch and a capital market investment consultant of the same company, for aiding and abetting the aforementioned acts. The sanctions imposed on these five persons took effect

and found that the aforesaid persons jointly acted to cause BF and ASC, two related companies where Jalernrat was the director, to issue post-dated cheques to TUCC and Thai Niche, a subsidiary of TUCC

the Company through the juristic persons under the control of SSG CH, SSG III and KG, i.e. Asia Credit Opportunities I (Mauritius) Limited (“ACO I”) and Link Capital I (Mauritius) Limited (“Link Capital

, L.P. (“SSG III”). Under the MOU, SSG III and its subsidiaries wish to engage in the debt restructuring of the Company through the juristic persons under the control of SSG CH, SSG III and KG, i.e. Asia

said transaction is not considered as the connected transaction as the Company does not sell the abovementioned assets to the connected persons as prescribed in the Notification on the Connected

Section 34 of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003) which contain certain provisions relating to the restriction of rights and liberties of persons which Section 29 in conjunction with Section 33, Section 34