the transactions. Failure to record the client's securities trading orders and obtaining authorization to make securities trading decisions on behalf of the client are, respectively, in violation of

public offering of securities without the effective registration statement and the draft prospectus from the SEC Office in violation of Section 65 and subject to sanctions under Section 276 of the

PICNI containing materially false or incorrect statement in order to deceive others. The action was violation of Section 312 of Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535. The Appeal Court overturned the

containing materially false or incorrect statement in order to deceive others. The action was violation of Section 312 of Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 The Appeal Court overturned the judgment of the

business. Hence, their actions were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. On November 21, 2022, the Samutprakan Provincial Court

result, their actions were in violation of Section 246 and Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992, in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. The three offenders refused to enter the

offer for NMG takeover. As a result, their actions were in violation of Section 246 and Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992, in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. The

result, their actions were in violation of Section 246 and Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992, in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. The three offenders refused to enter the

shareholders, which is in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535. SEC Act S.246 in conjunction with section 86 of the Penal Code Settlement Committee Meeting No. 7/2025 Settlement Committee

collateral. Furthermore, BAY failed to monitor and oversee the collateral while it was under its care. Such actions constitute a violation of Section 300 in conjunction with Section 46, which is subject to