a civil court26/03/2018 referred the case to a state attorney for filing a lawsuit to a civil court currently under the Court of First Instance considerationThe case that appears
a civil court26/03/2018 referred the case to a state attorney for filing a lawsuit to a civil court currently under the Court of First Instance considerationThe case that appears
securities on a continued basis with an intent to cause the price or the volume of such securities trading to be inconsistent with the normal market condition. 22/03/2024 filed a lawsuit to a civil court
company under Section 4 which issued debt securities. “Rehabilitation” means a company which has any one of the following characteristics: (1) being a company that the Thai court or the Foreign court has
business, a securities business or a derivatives business without license or registration; (11) Not being a person who has been subject to the final court decision for conducting business
Court (OAC) in support roles, at the professional level, for a study visit. This visit was part of a training program for OAC officials in support roles who are preparing for promotion to the senior
Prince Rapee Pattanasak Krom Luang Ratchaburi Direkrit, the Father of Thai Law, on the occasion of Prince Rapee Pattanasak Memorial Day. The ceremony took place on 7 August 2024, in front of the Court of
Singapore Court, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sent a written notice on 28 July 2022, requiring Zipmex to clarify the matter. Today, Zipmex Group has updated the progress on the moratorium
Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. Furthermore, the operation violated Emergency Decree Governing Fraudulent Borrowing B.E.2547 (2004). The Criminal Court dismissed the case. DV Act S.16 and Section
contravening Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. Furthermore, the operation violated Emergency Decree Governing Fraudulent Borrowing B.E.2547 (2004). The Criminal Court dismissed the case. DV Act S.16 and