several foreign residents to use services and advice of PFS to make investments. Furthermore, PFS advertised on www.fsplatinum.com that PFS was the administration office of Platinum Financial Services
advice of PFS to make investments. Furthermore, PFS advertised on www.fsplatinum.com that PFS was the administration office of Platinum Financial Services Limited Hong Kong, which specialized in a diverse
make investments. Furthermore, PFS advertised on www.fsplatinum.com that PFS was the administration office of Platinum Financial Services Limited Hong Kong, which specialized in a diverse range of
PFS to make investments. Furthermore, PFS advertised on www.fsplatinum.com that PFS was the administration office of Platinum Financial Services Limited Hong Kong, which specialized in a diverse range
to make investments. Furthermore, PFS advertised on www.fsplatinum.com that PFS was the administration office of Platinum Financial Services Limited Hong Kong, which specialized in a diverse range of
Company Limited (UMI) shares by allowing the accounts for securities trading and bank deposit to be opened in his name and facilitating relevant financial transactions. The court of first instance dismissed
Company Limited (UMI) shares by allowing the accounts for securities trading and bank deposit to be opened in his name and facilitating relevant financial transactions. The court of first instance disposed
financial statements for the year 2015, the annual registration statement for the year 2015 (Form 56-1, 2015), and the annual report for the year 2015 (Form 56-2, 2015) to the SEC within the specified period