Securities Exchange of Thailand Act B.E. 2517 (1974) and Sections 243 (1),(2) and 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Sections 83 and 91 of the Penal Code. They
cash or transferred the money to the juristic person claimed to be an agent from Hong Kong SAR or through currency exchange company in Thailand.According to the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003), any
Managing Director-Finance and Accounting of POWER, to dishonestly violate his duties and act to obtain unlawful gains for himself and/or other persons by permitting the company to pay 45 million baht deposit
settlement. On November 13, 2018, the Criminal Court ruled against him for violating Sections 243(1) 244(2) and 296 of the SEC Act conjunction with Section 86 of the Penal Code regarding METRO and TUCC shares
of Business Development, the Ministry of Commerce, Nittimon’s action was in violation of Section 33, Section 102 and Section 105 of the Public Companies Act of 1992, which do not give chairman of
Exchange Act, which was a result of a failure to order or act of POLAR's directors, namely: Mr. Yanakorn Warakunrak and Mr. Poonsak Chumchuay. Therefore, Mr. Yanakorn was liable to the civil sanctions
Exchange Act, which was a result of a failure to order or act of POLAR's directors, namely: Mr. Yanakorn Warakunrak and Mr. Poonsak Chumchuay. Therefore, Mr. Poonsak was liable to the civil sanctions
the entire securities of GLOW shares constitute a purchase or an acquisition of the business of other company, pursuant to Section 107(2)(b) of the Public Limited Companies Act B.E. 2535 (1992), and
the tender offer for the entire securities of GLOW shares constitute a purchase or an acquisition of the business of other company, pursuant to Section 107(2)(b) of the Public Limited Companies Act B.E