Appeal Court overturned the judgment of the Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006 that dismissed the case. The Court sentenced the accused to five year imprisonment for entering into gas tank
thier own benefits, which fraudulently caused damage to PICNI's property, violating Section 307, 308, 311. The Appeal Court sustained the judgment of the Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006
Mr. Porames Laongsuwan Mr. Porames Laongsuwan aided and abetted Mr.Theeratchanon Lapvisutisin and Ms.Supaporn Lapvisutisin to commit the offences, thereby violating Section 315 of the SEA. The Appeal
Mr. Pinij Putrasart Mr. Pinij Putrasart aided and abetted Mr.Theeratchanon Lapvisutisin and Ms.Supaporn Lapvisutisin to commit the offences, thereby violating Section 315 of the SEA. The Appeal Court
Mr. Piriya Thawon Mr. Piriya Thawon aided and abetted Mr.Theeratchanon Lapvisutisin and Ms.Supaporn Lapvisutisin to commit the offences, thereby violating Section 315 of the SEA. The Appeal Court
, and helping with related financial transactions. The Appeal Court dismissed the case. SEC Act S.243(1)(2) in conjunction with 244 and Section 86 of the Penal Code Criminal Complaint Filed with an
The Royal Ceramic Industry PLC (RCI) by arranging trading accounts of other persons for Mr. Sagha, sending manipulative trading orders, and helping with related financial transactions. The Appeal Court
first instance dismissed the lawsuit. The case is under consideration by the Court of Appeal. Fails to pay the fine within deadline set by the Criminal Fining Committee. SEC Act S.243 in conjunction with
instance dismissed the lawsuit.The case is under consideration by the Court of Appeal. Fails to pay the fine within deadline set by the Criminal Fining Committee. SEC Act S.243 in conjunction with Section 83