Company Limited (UKEM) through seven securities trading accounts in concealment, on a continual basis and matched orders within the group to mislead the general public in UKEM share trading values and
Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Baht 234,500. Since the accused pled guilty, the Court reduced the fines by half, resulting in a fine of Baht 117,250 and a further fine of Baht 250 each
half, resulting in a fine of Baht 117,250 and a further fine of Baht 250 each day starting from the next day of the prosecution date until the company so complies. SEC Act S.300 Criminal Complaint
everyday starting from the next day of prosecution date until the company so complies. Since the defendant pleaded guilty, the Court reduced the fines by half, resulting in a fine of Baht 30,000 and a
Court reduced the fines by half, resulting in a fine of Baht 116,100 and a further fine of Baht 100 each day starting from the next day of prosecution date until the company so complies. SEC Act S.300
financial statements for the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 to the SEC and the SET with in the specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged offender; however
), Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289, and the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003), Section 16 and subject to sanctions under Section 125 respectively. This case is in the process of inquiry by
, Their action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307
action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307, 308