.{A} case was referred from the Stock Exchange of Thailand for the SEC's further investigation while cases of {B} and {C} were detected by the SEC's routine inspection. The SEC found from the probe that
offerors failed to comply with rules specified by the Capital Market Supervisory Board by virtue of Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 as they did not deliver the offer document (“Form
failed to comply with rules specified by the Capital Market Supervisory Board by virtue of Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 as they did not deliver the offer document (“Form 247-4
by the Capital Market Supervisory Board by virtue of Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 as the offerors did not deliver the offer document (“Form 247-4”) to the shareholders of
with rules specified by the Capital Market Supervisory Board by virtue of Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 as the offerors did not deliver the offer document (“Form 247-4”) to the
financial statements for the year 2013 and the annual registration statement for the year 2013 (Form 56-1) to the SEC Office and the Stock Exchange of Thailand within the period specified in the notification
statements for Q3/2017 to the SEC Office and the Stock Exchange of Thailand within the period specified in the notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board. On July 2, 2020,The Criminal Court
shares to exceed trigger point at 50 percent of the total voting rights of JAS. However, Mr. Pete failed to comply with rules specified by the Capital Market Supervisory Board by virtue of Section 247 of
in TAPAC shares to exceed trigger point at 25 percent of the total number of voting rights of TAPAC, but Mr. Surachai failed to comply with tender offer rules specified by the Capital Market