party 2.3 ( ) Acquisition of a juristic person under Section 258 ( ) Termination of status of a juristic person under Section 258 4. The highest price paid by the reporting person or person in the
party 2.3 ( ) Acquisition of a juristic person under Section 258 ( ) Termination of status of a juristic person under Section 258 4. The highest price paid by the reporting person or person in the
party 2.3 ( ) Acquisition of a juristic person under Section 258 ( ) Termination of status of a juristic person under Section 258 4. The highest price paid by the reporting person or person in the
party 2.3 ( ) Acquisition of a juristic person under Section 258 ( ) Termination of status of a juristic person under Section 258 4. The highest price paid by the reporting person or person in the
The Constitutional Court has passed a unanimous ruling that the presumption of persons having known or possessed the inside information under Section 243 and Section 244 of the Securities and
Phra Khanong District Court regarding investment contracts under the Land Banking Investment Fund Agreement, with a total claim value of approximately 190 million baht, and (2) an arbitration dispute in
of debenture without approval in violation of Section 33 and subject to the penalties under Section 268 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA); meanwhile, Ornpaphat and Kanyakorn
-public facts that influenced the securities price. His act was liable to the offences under Section 241 and the punishments under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA
was a securities purchase that took advantage of a material, non-public fact that influenced the securities price, which was deemed an exploitation of third parties and liable to the offences under
derivatives business without obtaining license or registration from the SEC, in violation of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003), Section 16 and subject to sanctions under Section 125 of an imprisonment up to