as the investment in a medium-sized booth of the painting segment, new warehouse, new machinery and equipment for Jiangsu, China. While selling and administrative expenses in proportional to sale

compared to the same period of last year. The increased of financial cost was mainly in proportional to the Company’s and its subsidiaries’ operation as well as impact the averaged higher interest rate as

” to practice and there was no retrospective restatement of previous year as comparative. According to the above mentioned reasons, they affected to the Company’s loose before corporate income tax amount

practice and there was no retrospective restatement of previous year as comparative. According to the above mentioned reasons, the Company’s lost before income tax was Baht 10.77 million. It decreased Baht

restatement of previous year as comparative. According to the above reasons, they affected to the Company’s profit before corporate income tax amount to Baht 4.72 million. It decreased Baht 4.41 million or

.pdf , Book Value per share adjusted by market value of property and investment in listed companies (Adjusted Book per share), comparative valuation by market approach by book value approach (Price per

SEC Secretary-General Ruenvadee Suwanmongkol said “this is the first time in Thailand that a comparative study between Thai laws on the supervision of auditors and audit firms in Thai capital

SASCO surveyed assets used in comparison to assess market prices Item Appraised Asset Comparative Information Land 1 Land 2 Land 3 Asset Characteristics Vacant Land Land and Building Location Next to Rama

assets increased from accrued export incentive and directors’ remuneration, investments in joint ventures increased from proportional shareholding in Safe - 4 - Energy Holdings Company Limited, property

ventures increased from proportional shareholding in Safe Energy Holdings Company Limited which has already registered during this period. However, cash and cash equivalents decreased from repayment of short