website, and soliciting the public to invest in the shares of the companies, Benson Dupont Capital Management and Morgan Pacific via the telephone. These actions caused investors to suffer damages of
illustrating making trading decision before client acknowledgement. The client then acknowledged the transactions without any objection and made payment completely. {A}'s actions were deemed using client
client's child, as well as sometimes taking orders via mobile phone.{A}'s actions were deemed as obtaining authorization from client to make securities trading decisions on behalf of client; taking
the clients. They cannot make securities trading decisions on behalf of clients, regardless of the client's permission. In this regard, the aforesaid {A}'s actions are in violation of Clause 20(2) of
shares of which accounted for his trading. It was 87.11% increase in SSI total trading volume. After he stopped trading, SSI trading volume dropped to 48.85 million shares.His actions caused SSI share
) Intermediaries: Surveillance, monitoring, inspection and investigation of business operators and related capital market personnel;(5) Enforcement: Legal actions against the violators;(6) Toward international
actions, as aider and abettor, were in violation of Section 241 of the SEA in conjunction with Section 86 of the Penal Code.As the three persons agreed to enter the settlement procedure, the Settlement
be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be. The said actions also caused damage to the company but brought about
Fanpage : Insight On-Chain : ส่องข้อมูลออนเชน and Line OpenChat : Insight On-Chain มาคุยกัน The aforementioned actions by OKX are deemed to be conducting digital asset business without a license, with the