on the clients? behalf at a high trading volume and value. Later, the clients demanded her to compensate for losses incurred from trading. In addition, {A} admitted to trading in such manner by giving

trading orders or trading MBAX’s stocks in such a way that deceive investors by controlling or artificially affecting the price or volume of the securities, and placing trading orders or trading securities

or sale volume of those cryptocurrencies. In this regard, the Market Maker had reported trading activities in its account to Satang for Satnag’s acknowledgement. Satang’s offence was resulted from

or sale volume of those cryptocurrencies. In this regard, the Market Maker had reported trading activities in its account to Satang for Satnag’s acknowledgement. LLC Fair Expo’s offence was resulted

or sale volume of those cryptocurrencies. In this regard, the Market Maker had reported trading activities in its account to Satang for Satnag’s acknowledgement. LLC Fair Expo’s offence was resulted

regarding the purchase volume or sale volume of those cryptocurrencies. In this regard, the Market Maker had reported trading activities in its account to Satang for Satnag’s acknowledgement. Satang’s

regarding the purchase volume or sale volume of those cryptocurrencies. In this regard, the Market Maker had reported trading activities in its account to Satang for Satnag’s acknowledgement. LLC Fair

regarding the purchase volume or sale volume of those cryptocurrencies. In this regard, the Market Maker had reported trading activities in its account to Satang for Satnag’s acknowledgement. Satang’s

regarding the purchase volume or sale volume of those cryptocurrencies. In this regard, the Market Maker had reported trading activities in its account to Satang for Satnag’s acknowledgement. LLC Fair

investment consultants found that {A} failed to keep complete records of a high volume of client's derivatives trading orders; while {B} failed to keep complete documentation and evidence of many derivatives