Bangkok, June 11, 2015 ? The SEC revealed that the Settlement Committee imposed a fine of 15,469,345.62 baht on (1) Boonchai Jirapongtrakul, (2) Boonchoke Santuchpanit (or Thiratarakorn), (3) Vallaya

to inform such material information led to the Revenue Department?s demand for refund of the tax deduction money plus a fine imposed on the client. {A}, however, has already compensated for the

mislead other persons was in violation of Section 238 and liable to the penalties under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992. He was imposed a criminal fine of 500,000 baht.

and Section 86 of the Penal Code, and liable to the penalties under Section 296 of the SEA, i.e., up to two years? imprisonment or a fine twice the amount of the benefits received or should have

years for his assistance in the FOCUS share price manipulation by providing trading accounts, sending trading orders and arranging financial matters. The Settlement Committee had previously imposed a fine

executive in securities issuing companies or securities companies for specified periods, with the following details:  (1) Penprapa shall pay a civil fine, a compensation in the amount equal to the benefit

baht and 500,000 baht, respectively. A fine of 333,333.33 baht was also imposed on Jantharapa for violation of Section 243 (1) in conjunction with Section 244 and Section 243(2) of the SEA and Section 86

Mine’s reserves, PDI stopped its mining activities in 2016 and ceased the conventional zinc business end 2017, whilst sustaining part of the zinc related activities under a metal trading business

reserves, PDI stopped its mining activities in 2016 and ceased the conventional zinc business end 2017. Whilst sustaining part of the zinc related activities under a metal trading business, PDI reassessed

Thailand Due to depletion of Mae Sod Mine’s reserves, PDI stopped its mining activities in 2016 and ceased the conventional zinc business end 2017. Whilst sustaining part of the zinc related activities under