?s information disclosure system. Earlier, the auditor had, in accordance with Section 89/25 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), informed the company?s audit committee of the

documents. The SEC, therefore, considers the tender offeror has not yet submitted the tender offer in accordance with Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535. Earlier, the SEC received

(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. As the 9 persons named above agreed to enter the settlement procedure, the Settlement Committee

CMO shares acquired during the latter period.The aforesaid actions were in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), the Settlement Committee therefore imposed

work systems were in violation of Section 113 and the company was subject to the penalties under Section 282 of the SEA. As a result, the Settlement Committee imposed the fine of 1,101,000 baht on AEC

inappropriate and illegal actions by its employees.  The aforesaid defects of AEC work systems were in violation of Section 113 and the company was subject to the penalties under Section 282 of the SEA. As a

trading values and volumes to be inconsistency with normal market condition to mislead and lure the general public into such trading and were therefore in violation of Section 243(2) of the Securities and

court SEC Act (before the fifth amendment) Section 241 Civil Action Dated 24/10/2017

as well as a violation of Section 89/7 of the same Act, as the case may be. This case is in the process of inquiry by the special case inquiry official. SEC Act S.307 308 311 312 313 315 89/7

9 individuals as mentioned above supporting this activity. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. DAB Act S.26 and Section 86 of Penal Code Criminal Complaint Filed with an