deemed as failure to inform the client of sufficient information which was material and relevant to the client's investment decision, in violation of Clause 20(2) of the Notification of Capital Market

securities trading as well as amount of securities and prices, all of which were acknowledged by the client's authorized person. Making securities trading decisions on behalf of client is in violation of

disagree with the change.  Accordingly, Bee?s purchases of EIC shares through the SET at the price higher than the tender offer price resulted in a violation of the tender offer rules promulgated under

information that might adverse affect the client's benefits. Failing to inform sufficient information by concealing material information is, respectively, in violation of Clause 20(2) of the Notification of

adverse affect the client's benefits. Failing to inform sufficient information by concealing material information is, respectively, in violation of Clause 20(2) of the Notification of Capital Market

trading orders. In this regard, {A} and {B} actions were deemed the violation of Clause 20(3) of the Notification of Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorLorThor. 3/2555 Re: Approval for Personnel of

quarter during the past three years (2007-2009). {A} had access to this inside information by virtue of his position as a {X1} director at that time.{A}' s action was deemed the violation of Section 241 of

obtaining authorization from client to make securities trading decision on behalf of client, in violation of Clause 20(2) of the Notification of Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorLorThor. 3/2555 Re

dividend payment from IT Q4/2012 operational result. The aforesaid action was in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) which shall be liable to punishment under Section

violation of Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The above persons, named in the criminal complaint filed by the SEC, are deemed as having untrustworthy