{X1} Company shares in his own securities trading account by using the aforementioned information learnt during his directorship in {X1} Company. {A} and {B}'s actions were in violation of Section 241
client of trading orders via telephone at the end of the trading day.Making securities trading decisions on behalf of client is in violation of Clause 20(2) of the Notification of Capital Market
imposed fines on another principal and aiders or abettors of the RICH price manipulation scheme.The action of {A}, one of the principals in the RICH price manipulation scheme, was in violation of Sections
the aforementioned information learnt from her position of TUCC chief finance officer. Yongyuth and Vorapin?s actions were in violation of Section 241 which is subject to sanctions under Section 296 of
deemed as failure to inform the client of sufficient information which was material and relevant to the client's investment decision, in violation of Clause 20(2) of the Notification of Capital Market
securities trading as well as amount of securities and prices, all of which were acknowledged by the client's authorized person. Making securities trading decisions on behalf of client is in violation of
disagree with the change. Accordingly, Bee?s purchases of EIC shares through the SET at the price higher than the tender offer price resulted in a violation of the tender offer rules promulgated under
information that might adverse affect the client's benefits. Failing to inform sufficient information by concealing material information is, respectively, in violation of Clause 20(2) of the Notification of
adverse affect the client's benefits. Failing to inform sufficient information by concealing material information is, respectively, in violation of Clause 20(2) of the Notification of Capital Market
trading orders. In this regard, {A} and {B} actions were deemed the violation of Clause 20(3) of the Notification of Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorLorThor. 3/2555 Re: Approval for Personnel of