Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) and thus liable to penalties under Section 296 of the said Act. As the aiders, Ratchanee, Krisda, and Preecha are subject to penalties under Section 296 of the Act in
allocation to seek personal gains for oneself or other persons. By committing such act which gained him more than 42 million baht in benefits, Chupong was deemed to have performed duties dishonestly. In
. By committing such act which gained him more than 42 million baht in benefits, {A} was deemed to have performed duties dishonestly. In addition to him, {B} and {C} were also involved in the act as
Securities Exchange of Thailand Act B.E. 2517 (1974) and Sections 243 (1),(2) and 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Sections 83 and 91 of the Penal Code. They
Securities Exchange of Thailand Act B.E. 2517 (1974) and Sections 243 (1),(2) and 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Sections 83 and 91 of the Penal Code. They
cash or transferred the money to the juristic person claimed to be an agent from Hong Kong SAR or through currency exchange company in Thailand.According to the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003), any
Managing Director-Finance and Accounting of POWER, to dishonestly violate his duties and act to obtain unlawful gains for himself and/or other persons by permitting the company to pay 45 million baht deposit
settlement. On November 13, 2018, the Criminal Court ruled against him for violating Sections 243(1) 244(2) and 296 of the SEC Act conjunction with Section 86 of the Penal Code regarding METRO and TUCC shares
of Business Development, the Ministry of Commerce, Nittimon’s action was in violation of Section 33, Section 102 and Section 105 of the Public Companies Act of 1992, which do not give chairman of
Exchange Act, which was a result of a failure to order or act of POLAR's directors, namely: Mr. Yanakorn Warakunrak and Mr. Poonsak Chumchuay. Therefore, Mr. Yanakorn was liable to the civil sanctions