และค่าตดัจ าหน่าย / ดอกเบ้ียจ่าย (3) หน้ีสินท่ีมีภาระดอกเบ้ียต่อก าไรก่อน ดอกเบ้ียจ่าย ภาษีเงินได ้ค่าเส่ือมราคา และค่าตดัจ าหน่าย (interest bearing debt to EBITDA ratio) (เท่า) หน้ีสินทั้งหมดท่ีมีภาระ

construction plans. • Construction and other payables decreased by Baht 499 million or 48% from the payment of construction of IRPC-CP and CHPP plant. • Debt profile 94% 6% 14 Financial Performance Project

& Analysis • Debt profile • The debt balance of the company and its subsidiaries as at 30 September 2017 was in Thai Baht currency and in Japanese Yen currency. • All interest-bearing debt is long-term debt

paid of 810 million Baht, a decrease of 166 million Baht or 17% as compared to 2017. The decrease in finance cost was due to repayments in various of debt instruments as a result of capital increase

Costs In 2018, the Company had total interest paid of 810 million Baht, a decrease of 166 million Baht or 17% as compared to 2017. The decrease in finance cost was due to repayments in various of debt

เน่ืองจากมีการช าระหน้ีจากการโอนกรรมสิทธ์ิอยา่งต่อเน่ืองทุกโครงการเป็นผลใหต้น้ทุน ทางการเงินลดลง ณ วนัท่ี 30 มิถุนายน 2562 บริษทัฯมีอตัราส่วนหน้ีสินต่อส่วนของผูถื้อหุน้(Debt to Equity Ratio)เท่ากบั

. Appropriateness of the Funding Structure In 2Q 2019, the Company had total debt to equity ratio of 81.6 times increased from 1Q 2018 at 16.1 times. The interest-bearing debt to equity ratio was 54.7 times increased

Profit Margin -51.05% -12.37% Debt to Equity Ratio (Time) 1.97 1.78 Total Expenses The 3-Month Operating Result as ended 30 June 2018 Construction Income In the 2nd quarter of 2018, the company and its

31% as compared to the same period last year of 260 million Baht. This was due to continuous effort in debt repayment in forms of Bill of Exchange, debentures and financial institution loans. The

working capital in their operation business as GSTEL was currently in the process of debt restructuring and seeking funds from external source with aim to enhance its balance sheet and improve their