market. In addition, there were records of the doubtful debt of the long trade receivables, the employee expenses such as bonus and the provision for penalty on project delay. Therefore, comparing the
Financial Policy Ratios Debt to Equity times 0.40 0.42 0.42 Interest coverage times 3,095.00 545.41 222.73 Dividend payout (%) 76.07%* 55.96% 55.68% * Pending approval from the 2020 annual general meeting of
commercially launched in September 2019, an increase in financial cost pressured by incremental debt financing to support business expansion which THB 5,357.8m loan facility to the acquisition of Outriggers was
Consulting fees for the audit of the business condition and legal aspects of the subsidiary investment in the amount of Baht 2.25 million. 9.3 In the year 2018, there was a reversal doubtful debt by Baht 7.69
ratio % 8.38 9.90 Return on Total Assets ratio % 3.24 3.76 Debt to Equity ratio Time 1.62 1.59 Net Interest Bearing Debt to Equity ratio Time 1.37 1.34 Financial ratio related to the profit decreased due
of 49.35 Million Baht. As at 31 December 2019, the Group’s Current ratio was 1.48 times which mean the company’s liquidity to payment on short-term liability was still high. While Debt to Equity tel:02
reserve doubtful debt as in previous years. As such, the selling expenses for the period of three months ended 30th June 2017 was 1.82 percent of revenue from sale and service, lower in compared with
on Total Assets ratio at 3.45 percent, Debt to Equity ratio at 1.69 times and Interest Bearing Debt to Equity ratio at 1.37 times. * The operational results were calculated based on the consolidated
debt 14 11 LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY LIABILITIES AND EQUITY BREAKDOWN 31 DECEMBER 2016 30 SEPTEMBER 2017 (THB mn) % out of total liabilities and equity (THB mn) % out of total liabilities and
previously mentioned. Capital Structure Net interest-bearing debt to equity stood at 0.31x At the initial stage of Singha Estate and with the strategy to grow its business via M&A, short-term debts, i.e