, 2019) to the SEC within the specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the alleged offender; however, attempt to arrest the alleged offender failed and the statute of
(Form 56-2, 2020) to the SEC within the specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, attempt to arrest the juristic person representatives failed and the statute of
2020 (Form 56-2, 2020) to the SEC within the specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, attempt to arrest the juristic person representatives failed and the statute of
year 2020 (Form 56-2, 2020) to the SEC within the specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, attempt to arrest the juristic person representatives failed and the statute
digital asset dealer without a license during the mentioned period. This case is under consideration of the public prosecutor. DAB Act S.26 and Section 83 of Penal Code Criminal Complaint Filed with an
was the person who presents the financial statement to Board of directors and approve the false financial statement. The public prosecutor issued a final non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final
Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. Furthermore, the operation violated Emergency Decree Governing Fraudulent Borrowing B.E.2547 (2004). The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the
contravening Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. Furthermore, the operation violated Emergency Decree Governing Fraudulent Borrowing B.E.2547 (2004). The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against
Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. Furthermore, the operation violated Emergency Decree Governing Fraudulent Borrowing B.E.2547 (2004). The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the
. Sonthaya Noicharoen, Mr. Thammanoon Thonglue, M.L.Chaipat Chayangkura and Mr. Thanongsak Srithongkham to defraud and embezzle PICNI assets, thereby causing damages to the company. The public prosecutor