). With the referral from the Stock Exchange of Thailand on irregular trading of UNIQ shares as a result of trading orders sent via two overseas omnibus accounts causing the changes of UNIQ share price and
, indicating that he had been authorized by his client to make securities trading decisions on the client's behalf. The communication record showed that {A} called to inform his client of the trading orders
trading. This resulted in high impact on RICH shares trading values and volumes while a number of trading orders were matched within the said group. {B} {C} and {D} aided or abetted the aforesaid actions
certain group of persons had their trading orders, on a continual basis, executed through trading accounts of other persons to lure the public to trade such shares as well while in fact the persons who
the trading volume of such shares on a large scale. In addition, several trading orders were matched within the same group, causing the PYLON trading to be inconsistent with the normal market condition
clients' securities trading orders. She then admitted that the clients' trading orders had been received via mobile phone and via blackberry messenger. In this regard, the aforesaid actions are in violation
client had ordered to sell 50,000 shares at 19 baht per share on February 25, 2014 but {A} instead submitted the selling orders for 49,000 shares at 17.50 baht per share. {A} admitted doing such action
from Krungsri Securities PLC., the SEC probed into the case and found that Atthapol submitted trading orders for the client?s securities trading account through IP address of Krungsri Securities during
years for his assistance in the FOCUS share price manipulation by providing trading accounts, sending trading orders and arranging financial matters. The Settlement Committee had previously imposed a fine
Limited (“TIGER”) by placing trading orders or trading TIGER’s stocks in such a way that deceive investors by controlling or artificially affecting the price or volume of the securities, and placing trading