of the SEA. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.311 and Section 89/7 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 17/11/2016
. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code Criminal
prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was final. SEC Act S.Section 89/7 in conjunction with section 281/2 paragraph 2 307 311 312 313 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated
. Tharakorn Junkerd, (6) Mr. Akkarapol Lohitthai, (7) VBB , (8) Mr. Chamni Chantarasupawong, and (9) Mr. Isres Chalermrut. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final
) Mr. Akkarapol Lohitthai, (7) VBB , (8) Mr. Chamni Chantarasupawong, and (9) Mr. Isres Chalermrut. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.89/7
) Mr. Akkarapol Lohitthai, (7) VBB , (8) Mr. Chamni Chantarasupawong, and (9) Mr. Isres Chalermrut. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.89/7
was deemed final. SEC Act S.89/7 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 26/02/2018
deemed beneficial to the adjudication process, the Court considered it a mitigating factor. Accordingly, the sentence was reduced by half under Section 78 of the Criminal Code. The final sentence is a fine
deemed beneficial to the adjudication process, the Court considered it a mitigating factor. Accordingly, the sentence was reduced by half under Section 78 of the Criminal Code. The final sentence is a fine
damage to IFEC. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.307 311 313 in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code Criminal Complaint Filed with an