stabilized the share price including matching orders among those accounts. The actions resulted in increase in the UNIQ closing price from 2.24 baht on July 17, 2009 to the highest at 8.70 baht on November 6
business thoroughly, causing incomplete disclosure in the filing concerning risk factors, conflict of interests, and trade mark.Akekajak?s actions were considered as failure to comply with the SEC Office
learned of such facts from his positions at SLC.His actions were deemed using inside information to gain unfair benefits over other persons in contravention of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act
traded TPC shares on a continual basis, causing the share price to be inconsistent with the normal market condition. {D} and {E} aided and abetted the said actions by allowing the use of their trading
trading. This resulted in high impact on RICH shares trading values and volumes while a number of trading orders were matched within the said group. {B} {C} and {D} aided or abetted the aforesaid actions
trade securities in the client's account without permission in order to achieve better performance. {A}'s actions are in violation of Clause 20(1) and 20(2) of the Notification of Capital Market
and his client showed that he had used the client's account to trade securities for himself.{A}'s actions were deemed the violation of Clauses 20(1) and (3) of the Notification of Capital Market
(1992) (SEA); while Usavadee and Perayuth?s actions, as aider and abettor, were in violation of Section 241 of the SEA in conjunction with Section 86 of the Penal Code.As the three persons agreed to enter
obtaining the clients? instructions. They cannot make securities and derivatives trading decisions on behalf of clients, regardless of the client's permission. In this regard, the aforesaid {A}'s actions