accidents. Business wise Q3 2019 as in Q2 the macro economy and the competitive landscape remains challenging. The continuing weakness in the steel sector had a significant volume and revenue impact, but we
the following factors: 1) gradual relaxation of COVID-19 epidemic control measures and progress in vaccination 2) the impact of outstanding demand from the previous quarter and 3) government policies
slight negative impact from the spread of Covid-19 in Q4 2019/20 which result in lower consumption; however the sale of food packaging segment increase to help offset the negative impact. 2. Total cost of
understanding of the Company's nature of business, including the key factors that have an impact on business opportunities or constraints – for example, acquisition of business license, concession and investment
gained from Phase 3 of the new plant that supported volume growth helped lessen the effect of the above on profit margin. The Company was capable to maintain a satisfactory level of profitability that
0.18 -150% -0.02 350% -0.09 -1.57 -94% Note: (1) Adjusted EBITDA refers to EBITDA excluding impact of Stock Gain/(Loss) and NRV (2) Extra item was from reversal of inventory derogation because a supplier
million in 2016 and THB 1,583 million in 2015. Capital Expenditure was higher in 2015 due to the higher capital expenditure from Ayutthaya plant compared to recent years after the impact of the flood in
THB mm • Write off investment in Skoop and The Alley, Chiang Mai Branch 1.5 THB mm • Effect of compliance the Thai financial reporting standards, No. 9 and No. 16 costs by 0.5 THB mm. For the three
- nesia due to certain debottlenecking projects and a technical glitch which have been overcome in end 4Q17. An impact from utilization of cash flow to prepay part of trade payables also had a moderate