was notified by the competent officer to comply with such orders, Zipmex delivered only partial or incomplete information. In addition, Zipmex delayed the delivery of information requested by the
of information requested by the competent officer without a reasonable cause or excuse. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. DAB Act S.75 Criminal Complaint Filed with an
year 2017 was advanced to Baht 193.83 million, a growth of 24.33% over same period of last year which was mainly driven by:- Growing of 11.87% consolidated revenues over the same period of last year to
ever-growing asset management business by, for example, relaxing several requirements. In so doing, appropriate investor protection is maintained, and more investment choices promoted.? Such amendments
transactions to market prices, nor explained whether or not the price differences were reasonable. Later, TIES requested for postponement of submitting the rectified and audited 2014 financial statements, due on
requested a permission from the court and therefore, requested for the extended deadline from the SEC to clarify and publicly disclose the information within 60 days after the bankruptcy court’s permission
30 November 2017. The SEC later extended the deadline for PACE as requested, to 15 January 2018. However, PACE has failed to submit the clarification and disclose the required information within the
2025.* Subsequently, CHARAN requested an extension of the submission deadline, citing the engagement of a consulting firm to enhance its data preparation processes and information technology
within 30 November 2017. The SEC later extended the deadline for PACE as requested, to 15 January 2018. However, PACE has failed to submit the clarification and disclose the required information within