ในการช าระดอกเบีย้ (interest coverage ratio : ICR) (เท่า) 2.33 หนีส้ินที่มีภาระดอกเบีย้ต่อก าไรก่อนดอกเบีย้จ่าย ภาษีเงินได ้ค่าเสื่อมราคา และค่าตดัจ าหน่าย (interest bearing debt to EBITDA ratio) (เท่า
un o n tL fl s't fl n 1:9N u tFl fr 1 t6 0 1r ?1 a1 rrnynirri'n'irr,rilru (interest bearing debt to EBITDA ratio) (rvir) 6.59 Fre1r r{1r1 ?nlunrrdr eyn'r ayrCnil-u (debt service covera ge ratio : DSCR
. Also, there were concerns about pockets of risks in the property market, further accumulation of household debt, and debt serviceability of SMEs, especially those affected by changes in structural
power, as farm income continued to be constrained by low prices of agricultural products and nonfarm income remained lackluster. Moreover, high levels of household debt caused the generation of new loans
Analysis For 2Q20 and 6M20 P a g e | 8 As of 30 June 2020, the Company had Interest bearing debt to equity attributable to owners of the Company (IBD/E) ratio at 3.20 times and IBD/E ratio excluding TFRS 16
ratio was also close to the target of 42.31 percent. At the same time, our robust capital position was sufficient to cushion against risk, and greater than the Bank of Thailand’s requirement. As evidenced
$ billions) 1.9 1.4 Unutilized credit line (US$ billions) 1.7 1.3 Financial Ratios Current ratios (times) 1.4 1.3 Debt Servicing Coverage Ratio (DSCR) times 3.5 2.9 Interest coverage ratio (times) 9.1 6.7 Note
$ billions) 1.9 1.4 Unutilized credit line (US$ billions) 1.7 1.3 Financial Ratios Current ratios (times) 1.4 1.3 Debt Servicing Coverage Ratio (DSCR) times 3.5 2.9 Interest coverage ratio (times) 9.1 6.7 Note
household purchasing power remained weak. Despite improvements of both farm and nonfarm income, households’ purchasing power is compressed by the high debt burden and the waning confidence regarding
ratio was also close to the target, at 43.96 percent. At the same time, our robust capital position was sufficient to cushion against risk, and greater than the Bank of Thailand’s requirement. As