to abide by the Securities and Exchange Act, B.E. 2535 (1992) and the Derivatives Act, B.E. 2546 (2003). They must not have behavior for unfair trade. Examples are analyses with distorted
the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in conjunction with Section 83 and Section 86 of the Penal Code. The public prosecutor subsequently filed the case with the Criminal Court against {A
Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) had imposed a fine on Lalana in the amount of 36,815,524.26 baht for manipulative trading by colluding with others in providing and using other persons
the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) and thus liable to penalties under Section 296 of the said Act. As he agreed to enter the settlement procedure, the Settlement Committee imposed a
dividend payment from IT Q4/2012 operational result. The aforesaid action was in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) which shall be liable to punishment under Section
Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) which shall be liable to punishment under Section 296 of the Act. The Settlement Committee therefore imposed a 2,820,000 baht fine on Ratanachai.
information to trade securities for his own and others? benefits in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) which shall be liable to punishment under Section 296 of the
of Thailand Act and the Ad hoc Committee on consideration of draft Securities and Exchange Act, the National Legislative Assembly, an expert member in the SEC?s Accounting and Corporate Governance
-General of DSI’s conflicting opinion on additional charges under Section 307, 308, 309, 311, 313 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act and under Section 264 and 268 of the Penal Code, and on the