clients? behalf.The misconducts of Veerachai and Jakkrit were deemed interference with clients? assets in concealment, fabrication of false evidence and exploitation of investors? trading accounts to seek
of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003). The companies? actions were also deemed as defrauding the public under Section 343 of the Penal Code as they deceived others by (1) showing false
Special Investigation (DSI) on account of misappropriating approximately 57.7 million baht of the company assets and falsifying documents and recording false accounting information during 2009-2010 while he
(DSI) on account of misappropriating approximately 57.7 million baht of the company assets and falsifying documents and recording false accounting information during 2009-2010 while he was in charge of
files criminal complaint on the grounds of suspicious disclosure of false information and/or embezzling or siphoning, shall be deemed to have untrustworthy characteristics under Clause 3 in conjunction
contain any false statement or omit any fact that should have been expressly disclosed in material respects; (b) I hereby acknowledge and give my permission for use of the information disclosed in this
beneficial facts or evidence in the trial of the case or the proceedings, or concealing or destroying the evidence of the case or giving false statements, etc.; Clause 4. A person having the prohibited
beneficial facts or evidence in the trial of the case or the proceedings, or concealing or destroying the evidence of the case or giving false statements, etc.; Clause 4. A person having the prohibited
beneficial facts or evidence in the trial of the case or the proceedings, or concealing or destroying the evidence of the case or giving false statements, etc.; Clause 4. A person having the prohibited
aiding or abetting thereof; (b) an offence regarding documents or accounts such as falsifying documents, using or referring to falsified documents, informing the competent officer to record false