client in an unprofessional manner.The actions of {C}, {D}, {F}, and {G} were deemed performing duties beyond the scope of employment, taking advantage of client by virtue of duties, and using client
. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code Criminal
, Their action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307
action were deemed a violation of Section 312 of the SEA. Moreover, their actions were also considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others in violation of Sections 307, 308
. Tharakorn Junkerd, (6) Mr. Akkarapol Lohitthai, (7) VBB , (8) Mr. Chamni Chantarasupawong, and (9) Mr. Isres Chalermrut. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final
) Mr. Akkarapol Lohitthai, (7) VBB , (8) Mr. Chamni Chantarasupawong, and (9) Mr. Isres Chalermrut. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.89/7
Service Company Limited (ESES) directors, assisted and supported the execution of such trading transactions. ESES is deemed under control of Mr. Saran This case is in the process of inquiry by the special
IEC, the buyers transferred the total payment of approximately 2.95 million baht into the accounts of Mr. Niwat Maenim, Mr. Sutin Promthong and North Environment Co., Ltd. (NE). NE is deemed under