commission of offense under Section 241 and liable to the penalties under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), which was effective at the time of the offenses. Currently, the
PROVIDENT FUND ACT PROVIDENT FUND ACT (No. 2) B.E. 2542 Section 9. The articles of the fund shall consist of at least the following particulars: (1) the name of the fund, which shall be preceded by
PROVIDENT FUND ACT PROVIDENT FUND ACT (No. 2) B.E. 2542 Section 9. The articles of the fund shall consist of at least the following particulars: (1) the name of the fund, which shall be preceded by
Supervisory Board No. Tor Jor. 15/2563 Re: Application for Approval and Granting of Approval for Offer for Sale of Newly Issued Shares (No. 8) By virtue of Section 16/6 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E
to other out-of-control wallets without client’ instructions. That actions incurred losses to others and public in violation of Section 85 of Digital Asset Businesses Law. It also violated Section 87
public. The said action was in contravention of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in conjunction with Section 86 of the Penal Code. The Southern Bangkok Criminal Court
that at this stage, the SEC and the public prosecutor will study the Appeal Court?s judgment for further appeal proceedings.The SEC on August 5, 2004 had filed a criminal complaint on this case with the
quarter during the past three years (2007-2009). {A} had access to this inside information by virtue of his position as a {X1} director at that time.{A}' s action was deemed the violation of Section 241 of
Novermber at 17.41 hours (after SET closing). His misconduct was in violation of Section 241 and liable to the penalties under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992).
financial benefits from trading derivatives on non-public information concerning JAS, i.e., dividend payment for the year 2015 and a repurchase scheme at the beginning of the following year, which he had