order or an action which results in the offence that the company operated digital asset exchange businesses without a license. The Court of Appeal adjudicated that the defendant was guilty under Section

from the SEC, in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official of

violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official of Economic Crime

Council of State.In brief, the Draft includes the following amendments:  1. Add provisions to accommodate electronic securities issuance (Part 2/1: Electronic Securities, from Section 62/1 to Section 62/11

(2003) which contains certain provisions in relation to the restriction of rights and liberty of persons which Section 29, in conjunction with Section 33, Section 34, Section 36, Section 41, Section 43

license granted The installment term above is subjected to the condition for providing telecommunication service in the key economic area as explained in section 4.2. In case that the licensee does not

failure to perform duties responsibly, carefully and honestly under Section 307, Section 308, Section 311, Section 312 and Section 313 and Paragraph 2 of Section 281/2 in conjunction with Section 89/7 file

amount totaling THB 350,000,000 at the rate of THB 0.35 per share and set the record date on 28 August 2017; to gather the names pursuant to section 225 of the Securities and Exchange Act by way of book

providing assistance or facilitation to Pasu. The acts of Pasu, Vichan, and Akarat were liable to be an offense of colluding to manipulate securities price in violation of Section 244/3(1)(2) in conjunction

concealing the identity of the person who was the real user of those accounts.Pattanapong?s action was deemed to be in violation of Section 243 (1) in conjunction with Section 244 and Section 243(2) of the