Sections 307, 308, 311, 312, 313 and 315 of the SEA as well as a violation of Section 89/7 liable to the penalty under Section 281/2 of the same Act, as the case may be. Any person against whom the SEC
cases, none of the aforementioned entities had been licensed to operate securities business. Hence, their actions were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289 of the
Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 and 86 of the Penal Code. In addition, certain evidence pointed that securities trading orders executed through others? trading
FOCUS share price. Her jail term, however, was suspended for two years.Yesterday (October 31, 2012), the Criminal Court ruled against two share price manipulators for violating Section 243(1), (2) in
business without license or registration with the SEC in violation of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003) and thus liable under Section 125 of the same Act to imprisonment for a term not
Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA) and the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (DA). Under Section 289 of the SEA, the said violation was subject to an imprisonment from 2-5 years or a fine from 200,000-500,000 baht or both
which are land title deed no. 17090 and land title deed no. 53138 at the total amount of Baht 547,625,000.- within April 2020.) (Originally, SPI’s payment according to the value of remaining land plots on
Operators B.E. 2559 (2016) ______________________ By virtue of Section 110 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E 2535 (1992) and Clause 2 of the Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board No
. 2559 (2016) ______________________ By virtue of Section 110 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E 2535 (1992) and Clause 2 of the Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorThor. 88