Surapol was deemed a contravention of Section 242(1) in conjunction with Section 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). These individuals are subject to the penalties under

only the beginning of the criminal enforcement process. As to whether any persons are offenders shall be subject to the investigation of the inquiry official, the prosecution of the public prosecutor

already appropriate. In this regard, the transactions above are deemed acquisition of assets and related party transactions;  therefore, they are subject to approval of the shareholders’ meeting

; and any previous record or past behavior which indicating that the subject person is not fit and proper to work in capital market business. The SEC strongly advises that investors check their trading

million.  In addition, the company may be subject to risks that the transaction may have a material impact on the company, in that the company may not have sufficient funds, the operating results and

past conduct; the cooperation or obstruction with SEC’s investigation; and any previous record or past behavior which indicating that the subject person is not fit and proper to work in capital market

of data, and explicit notification of the rights of the data subject, including the right to access and obtain a copy of personal data, the right to data portability, and the right to eliminate or

further legal actions.The filing of a criminal complaint is just the commencement of the criminal proceedings, whereby the consideration of whether any person is guilty is subject to the inquiry official’s

any transaction not their own, or risk being exploited for an offense without their knowledge or subject to litigation in connection with an investment consultant?s misconduct

of the Penal Code. In addition, as Sippakorn and Jantharapa are also capital market personnel, their involvements with the aforesaid share manipulation are subject to SEC?s consideration. (2) SAMART