cases, none of the aforementioned entities had been licensed to operate securities business. Hence, their actions were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289 of the

Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 and 86 of the Penal Code. In addition, certain evidence pointed that securities trading orders executed through others? trading

FOCUS share price. Her jail term, however, was suspended for two years.Yesterday (October 31, 2012), the Criminal Court ruled against two share price manipulators for violating Section 243(1), (2) in

business without license or registration with the SEC in violation of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003) and thus liable under Section 125 of the same Act to imprisonment for a term not

Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (SEA) and the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (DA). Under Section 289 of the SEA, the said violation was subject to an imprisonment from 2-5 years or a fine from 200,000-500,000 baht or both

Operators B.E. 2559 (2016) ______________________ By virtue of Section 110 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E 2535 (1992) and Clause 2 of the Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board No

. 2559 (2016) ______________________ By virtue of Section 110 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E 2535 (1992) and Clause 2 of the Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorThor. 88

, the group percentage after theacquisition/disposition and the person(s) under Section 258 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E.2535 . Preliminary version: incomplete and/or being reviewedinformation

after theacquisition/disposition and the person(s) under Section 258 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E.2535 . Preliminary version: incomplete and/or being reviewedinformation. Revised version: new

/disposition, the group percentage after theacquisition/disposition and the person(s) under Section 258 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E.2535 . Preliminary version: incomplete and/or being