considered that the offence of ALL was the result of an order or action of Mr. Dusadee and Mr. Thanakorn. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. SEC Act S.300 in conjunction with
order. In addition, the aforementioned act of Mr. Aran was assisted or facilitated by Miss Mintita Panawattanayos, Miss Kanjanakorn Teachapan, Miss Sopacha Charoensuk, GISP and Liger. This case is in the
. Aran’s order. In addition, the aforementioned act of Mr. Aran was assisted or facilitated by Miss Mintita Panawattanayos, Miss Kanjanakorn Teachapan, Miss Sopacha Charoensuk, GISP and Liger. This case is
. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. SEC Act S.315 in conjunction with 311 281/2 paragraph 2 89/7 and 89/24 and 86 of the Penal Code Criminal Complaint Filed with an
order. In addition, the aforementioned act of Mr. Aran was assisted or facilitated by Miss Mintita Panawattanayos, Miss Kanjanakorn Teachapan, Miss Sopacha Charoensuk, GISP and Liger. This case is in the
order. In addition, the aforementioned act of Mr. Aran was assisted or facilitated by Miss Mintita Panawattanayos, Miss Kanjanakorn Teachapan, Miss Sopacha Charoensuk, GISP and Liger. This case is in the
collection or any other compensation to be collected from the securities issuer. Clause 5/1 ( In the case where the Office has considered that the applicant for a license under Clause 3 has the accurate and
issuer. Clause 5/1 In the case where the Office has considered that the applicant for a license under Clause 3 has the accurate and complete qualifcations as specified, the Office shall propose the case
application for approval for derivatives trading according to Clause 7 within thirty days as from the date on which the Office receives the complete application and supplementary documents. Clause 9. In case
application and supplementary documents. Clause 9. In case the derivatives broker is a securities company which has obtained an approval from the Office to make a derivatives trading for their own account