trading. The aforesaid actions of Shine were in contravention of Sections 243(1), (2) and 244 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code

considered as syphoning TUCC money for the benefits of themselves and others, in violation of Sections 307, 308, 311, and 313 of the said Act.     Consequently, Yongyuth, Vacharee, Suchit, Nitaya and Suttirat

and Section 296/2 of the Securities and Exchange Act (No. 5) B.E. 2559 (2016). In the case of Usuma and Thitirat, their acts are liable to be the offenses under the aforesaid Sections in conjunction

, which may lead to imprisonment from 5 to 10 years and a double fine based on the asset value or the benefit received from violation of such sections, as the case may be, but in any case not less than

registration statement (Form 56-1) in particular provides important information in three sections: (1) nature of business operation of the company, group of companies and subsidiaries, (2) management and

the sanctions under Sections 296 and 296/2 of the SEA.The Civil Sanction Committee (CSC) has resolved to impose civil sanctions on those two offenders, comprising a civil fine, a compensation in the

be in violation of Section 243 (1) in conjunction with Sections 244 and 243 (2) of the same Act and Section 86 of the Criminal Code. The Settlement Committee thus imposed a separate fine of 333,333.33

paragraph of Section 281/2 in conjunction with Section 89/7 and Sections 307, 308, 311 and 313 of the Securities Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA).His above actions caused NIPPON?s failure to record and

281/2 in conjunction with Section 89/7 and Sections 307, 308, 311 and 313 of the Securities Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA).His above actions caused NIPPON's failure to record and prepare its

violating Sections 307, 308, 311 in conjunction with Section 313, and Section 312(2)(3) of  the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). He was sentenced to serve 8-year imprisonment for corporate