Somchai refused, the SEC filed a criminal complaint against Somchai with the DSI on September 4, 2012 while the Settlement Committee on August 20, 2012 imposed a fine on Chaninan and Tanakorn in the amount
Somchai refused, the SEC filed a criminal complaint against Somchai with the DSI on September 4, 2012 while the Settlement Committee on August 20, 2012 imposed a fine on Chaninan and Tanakorn in the amount
Somchai refused, the SEC filed a criminal complaint against Somchai with the DSI on September 4, 2012 while the Settlement Committee on August 20, 2012 imposed a fine on Chaninan and Tanakorn in the amount
in violation of Section 246 and Section 247 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992, in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. The three offenders refused to enter the criminal fining
received but in any case no less than 500,000 baht, or both.Paweena, Punnaporn, Warunya and Trairath refused to enter the criminal fining process. The SEC therefore filed a criminal complaint with the DSI
executives for 22 months or 28 months (as the case may be).In this regard, while one offender agreed to comply with the civil sanctions imposed by the CSC, Miss Paranya Rudjanapronpajee refused to do so
directors or executives for 28 months or 17 months, as the case may be.In this regard, while one offender agreed to comply with the civil sanctions imposed by the CSC, Mr. Suthee Siripornpitak, refused to do
(1) Marnfah Group and (2) Ornpaphat agreed to pay a separate, equal fine of 500,000 baht, while (3) Kanyahorn agreed to pay a fine of 1,530,000 baht. On the contrary, (4) Lederer (Thailand) refused to
Disri refused to comply, which reflected their unwillingness to settle the case with the SEC at this stage. The SEC, therefore, sent a written request to the public prosecutor to file a lawsuit against
and Viroj with the DSI for further legal proceeding because they refused to enter the fining process with the Criminal Fining Committee. The other five offenders in the case, on the other hand, have