. Their financial and stock transactions were interconnected, while Mr. Suthee was also authorized to place trade orders in Mr. Peeranut’s securities trading account. During the incident period, Mr. Suthee
? former investor contact, {B}, had sent trading orders through the client's account without record and evidence of trading orders. His misconduct caused damage to the client and the firm dismissed him from
submitting orders via mobile phone before re-submitting the orders via the phone recorder in order to make up the evidence that the client had made her own trading decision. The investigation found that {A
Company Limited ("NEWS") by separating duties to executing buying or selling orders in a way of concealing and continuing, which caused the trading of such securities contradicted normal market
Corporation Public Company Limited ("NEWS") by separating duties to executing buying or selling orders in a way of concealing and continuing, which caused the trading of such securities contradicted
Limited ("NEWS") by separating duties to executing buying or selling orders in a way of concealing and continuing, which caused the trading of such securities contradicted normal market conditions
("POLAR") by separating duties to executing buying or selling orders in a way of concealing and continuing, which caused the trading of such securities contradicted normal market conditions in
Limited ("POLAR") by separating duties to executing buying or selling orders in a way of concealing and continuing, which caused the trading of such securities contradicted normal market