her employer, however, the suspension imposed by the SEC is deemed to have been served.  

benefit from realization of investment in associated company by equity method.  {A}'s action was deemed as using inside information in such a way as to take advantage of other persons in violation of

already been suspended by her employer, however, the suspension imposed by the SEC is deemed to have been served.

. Proceeds in the trading account belonged to {A}.Exploiting client's account for trading derivatives for one own benefit is deemed in violation of Clause 20(1) of the Notification of the Capital Market

recognized by the SEC and have been listed on the main boards of such exchanges at least for one year, they will be deemed to have been satisfied the criteria comparable to those of the SEC. The revision aims

deemed as failure to inform the client of sufficient information which was material and relevant to the client's investment decision, in violation of Clause 20(2) of the Notification of Capital Market

trading orders. In this regard, {A} and {B} actions were deemed the violation of Clause 20(3) of the Notification of Capital Market Supervisory Board No. TorLorThor. 3/2555 Re: Approval for Personnel of

quarter during the past three years (2007-2009). {A} had access to this inside information by virtue of his position as a {X1} director at that time.{A}' s action was deemed the violation of Section 241 of

securities trading decisions on behalf of the client. She then continuously made trading decision on behalf of the client for more than three months in high value and volume trades. {A}'s action was deemed as

violation of Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The above persons, named in the criminal complaint filed by the SEC, are deemed as having untrustworthy