and executives of the company, at the time of the offense, submitted false evidence and information to the competent official of the SEC. They submitted a false report from the independent financial
financial transactions through her own bank account, and (7) Veerawat, who also knew and persuaded several persons ? namely, Pattarapob, Sunchai, Teerasit and Kitisan ? to take the positions of director and
statements for the year 2002 and for the 1st and 2nd quarters of 2003 and thus misled shareholders and investors about DAIDO?s true financial condition. The said actions were in contravention of Section 312 of
approximately 30,000 shares to more than 600,000 shares. The seven offenders conspired to cause such irregular trading activities. Sathit was the financial source for the scheme whereby Tanyapa passed along the
, and securities depository center in accordance with Section 206 and Section 222 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA).* The Meeting also approved the principles for amending the
imprisonment for violating Section 312 of the SEA for permitting false records or no record of important information in POWER-P’s 2005 financial statements and documents, as well as incomplete, incorrect and
Exchange Commission No. Kor Thor. 4/2561 Re: Maintenance of Capital of Investment Advisors and Derivatives Advisors ________________________ By virtue of Section 14 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E
Section 8, Section 54, Section 55, Section 56 and Section 57 of the Trust for Transactions in Capital Market Act B.E. 2550 (2007) which contain certain provisions relating to the restriction of rights and