), Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. SEC Act S.90 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 09/04/2014

order or an action which results in the offence that the company operated digital asset exchange businesses without a license. The Court of Appeal adjudicated that the defendant was guilty under Section

from the SEC, in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official of

violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), Section 90 and subject to sanctions under Section 289. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official of Economic Crime

of First Instance consideration SEC Act (before the fifth amendment) Section 243 in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code Civil Action Dated 28/11/2024

under an appeal period SEC Act (the fifth amendment) Section 244/3 in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code Civil Action Dated 28/11/2024

Council of State.In brief, the Draft includes the following amendments:  1. Add provisions to accommodate electronic securities issuance (Part 2/1: Electronic Securities, from Section 62/1 to Section 62/11

(2003) which contains certain provisions in relation to the restriction of rights and liberty of persons which Section 29, in conjunction with Section 33, Section 34, Section 36, Section 41, Section 43

failure to perform duties responsibly, carefully and honestly under Section 307, Section 308, Section 311, Section 312 and Section 313 and Paragraph 2 of Section 281/2 in conjunction with Section 89/7 file

providing assistance or facilitation to Pasu. The acts of Pasu, Vichan, and Akarat were liable to be an offense of colluding to manipulate securities price in violation of Section 244/3(1)(2) in conjunction