shares at higher price than their market price at that time. Subsequently, they commit offense in using Miss Patcharapat’s securities trading account to purchase COL shares in such a way as to take
behaviors of placing trading orders in a manner that misled the public about the price or trading volume of securities, including the placing of consecutive trading orders aimed at deviating the price or
Stock Exchange of Thailand on 13 March 2017 and his statement at the press conference the following day when he reassured that the foreign borrowers were unrelated to him.As a result, he is liable to
correlated with the trading activities in the account for which Mr. Suthee was authorized to place price-manipulating orders. The actions of these two individuals constitute offenses under Section 244/3(1) in
orders in a continuous manner with the intent to manipulate the prices or trading volumes of the securities beyond normal market conditions.Patcharadanai’s actions were deemed a contravention of Section
arranging a trading system to facilitate digital asset trading with a fee collected at the rate of 0.1 percent of the customer’s trading value, had solicitation and advertisement in the Thai language to
have been disclosed, in materiality, in the Filing Form, in violation of Section 278 of the SEA. This offense of ETL at the time was a result of orders or omissions of duties of nine persons who were
exploitation of third parties and liable to the offences under Section 241 and the punishments under Section 296 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), which were in force at the time of
. 2535 (1992) (SEA), which were in force at the time of offence commission. In addition, such act is currently deemed an offence under Section 242 and subject to the punishments under Section 296 and