statements with intent to mislead other persons concerning the facts stated in BLISS financial statements.The SEC found that Chakkit, then BLISS executive, imparted the statements in the company?s Q2/2013, Q3
volume to be inconsistent with the normal market condition, the SEC probed into the case and found that Pimpa in colluding with Nophadol had used Nophadol?s and other persons? trading accounts to trade
with Section 83 of the Penal Code. As they all agreed to enter into the settlement procedure, the Settlement Committee imposed a fine of 1,074,121.25 baht on Sermkirt and a fine of 500,000 baht on
orders and payment. The said actions were in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). As they agreed to enter the settlement procedure, the Settlement Committee
said actions were in violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). As they agreed to enter the settlement procedure, the Settlement Committee therefore imposed fines on {A
violation of Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). As they agreed to enter the settlement procedure, the Settlement Committee fined {A} 2,580,211.77 baht, {B} 2,948,813.46 baht and
Section 56 in conjunction with first paragraph of 274 of SEA. The case was resulted from the action on June 30, 2005, where the SEC had filed complaints with Department of Special Investigation ("DSI
therefore filed a criminal complaint with the DSI for further legal proceedings on 14 July 2016. SEC Act S.Section 243 and Section 86 of Criminal Code Settlement Committee Meeting No. 5/2016 Settlement
others to use their trading accounts. This case is under consideration of the Court of First Instance. SEC Act S.243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal