the shareholders or the decision-making of investors.The SEC therefore, by virtue of Section 58(1) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), has instructed EARTH to (1) clarify whether the

with Section 83 of the Penal Code and Section 315 of the SEA (as the case may be). Moreover, Vijchu’s acts in particular, are deemed failure to perform duties as a private fund manager with honesty and

against {X1} Company Limited and strictly instructed the company to improve its compliance with the oversight regulations.The company's offense was liable to violation of Section 113 of the Securities and

pay a fine of 2,540,000 baht. The jail term, however, was suspended for three years.This follows the SEC?s criminal complaint filed with the Department of Special Investigation (DSI) on May 27, 2010

and intend to jointly control the company, such person or persons will be required to launch tender offer to purchase securities from all securities holders and report securities holding under Section

Bangkok, January 17, 2011 ? The SEC ordered Bliss-Tel Plc. (BLISS) to arrange a special audit by the auditor who has reviewed the company?s third quarterly financial statements of 2010 on the item of

benefit from realization of investment in associated company by equity method.  {A}'s action was deemed as using inside information in such a way as to take advantage of other persons in violation of

243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. The Settlement Committee therefore imposed a fine of 25

disagree with the change.  Accordingly, Bee?s purchases of EIC shares through the SET at the price higher than the tender offer price resulted in a violation of the tender offer rules promulgated under

Bangkok, June 16, 2015 ? The SEC is seeking public comment on the draft regulations to be issued under Section 152 of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003) on payment of bounty to the informer. Under