, by virtue of Section 58 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), has instructed IFEC and its directors to clarify the arrangement of such shareholders? meeting to the SEC and disclose such

the shareholders or the decision-making of investors.The SEC therefore, by virtue of Section 58(1) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), has instructed EARTH to (1) clarify whether the

with Section 83 of the Penal Code and Section 315 of the SEA (as the case may be). Moreover, Vijchu’s acts in particular, are deemed failure to perform duties as a private fund manager with honesty and

against {X1} Company Limited and strictly instructed the company to improve its compliance with the oversight regulations.The company's offense was liable to violation of Section 113 of the Securities and

securities investment records and income statement. His wrongdoings were in violation of Clause 2 of Section 281/2 in conjunction with Sections 89/7, 307, 308, 311, 312, and 313 of the SEA. With his confession

of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003). In this regard, the SEC filed a criminal complaint with the ECD Police against {X1} Co., Ltd. and its executives, namely {A}, as company director

and intend to jointly control the company, such person or persons will be required to launch tender offer to purchase securities from all securities holders and report securities holding under Section

29.9 million baht advance payment for advertising service by cashier cheque. Earlier, the auditor had, in accordance with Section 89/25 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992), informed the

Section 241 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992). The Settlement Committee therefore fined him 500,000 baht.  

243(1) in conjunction with 244 and 243(2) of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. The Settlement Committee therefore imposed a fine of 25