) Mr. Peeranut Siripornpitak, who is Mr. Suthee Siripornpitak’s son, jointly committed the offense of manipulating the RPC share price during the afternoon trading sessions between 18 and 31 August 2021
individuals above had personal relationships, financial trails or connections through associated persons. Specifically, (1) Pasu, (2) Vichan and (3) Akarat colluded to manipulate the price or trading volume of
Public Hearing System :: สำนักงานคณะกรรมกำกับหลักทรัพย์และตลาดหลักทรัพย์ แบบสำรวจความคิดเห็น Hearing Home หลักการบริหารกิจการที่ดี (Corporate Governance Code) ข้อมูลทั่วไป ชื่อผู้ตอบ
constituted public frauds contravening Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. Furthermore, the operation violated Emergency Decree Governing Fraudulent Borrowing B.E.2547 (2004). The statute of limitations ran
constituted public frauds contravening Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. Furthermore, the operation violated Emergency Decree Governing Fraudulent Borrowing B.E.2547 (2004). The statute of limitations ran
Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. Furthermore, the operation violated Emergency Decree Governing Fraudulent Borrowing B.E.2547 (2004). The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the
contravening Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. Furthermore, the operation violated Emergency Decree Governing Fraudulent Borrowing B.E.2547 (2004). The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against
Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. Furthermore, the operation violated Emergency Decree Governing Fraudulent Borrowing B.E.2547 (2004). The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order against the
Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. Furthermore, the operation violated Emergency Decree Governing Fraudulent Borrowing B.E.2547 (2004). The Criminal Court dismissed the case. DV Act S.16 and Section
contravening Section 343 and 83 of the Penal Code. Furthermore, the operation violated Emergency Decree Governing Fraudulent Borrowing B.E.2547 (2004). The Criminal Court dismissed the case. DV Act S.16 and