and TFG-W1 by using inside information concerning TFG’s operating results for the first quarter of 2559 or the second quarter of 2559,as the case may be, that had not been generally disclosed to the
incident, was responsible for the operation of Bitazza. His failure to perform the required duties of his position resulted in the offence committed by Bitazza concerning the case that during May 25, 2025
damages to ADAM even though it was known at that time that Kitha was being investigated by the National Anti-Corruption Commission (“NACC”) on a case relating to rice-pledging scheme and Kitha was not
incentive to launder money causing damages to ADAM even though it was known at that time that Kitha was being investigated by the National Anti-Corruption Commission (“NACC”) on a case relating to rice
-Corruption Commission (“NACC”) on a case relating to rice-pledging scheme and Kitha was not qualified to be a listed company in the Stock Exchange of Thailand. Their divided duties were meticulously planned
with an incentive to launder money causing damages to ADAM even though it was known at that time that Kitha was being investigated by the National Anti-Corruption Commission (“NACC”) on a case relating
damage to IFEC. The public prosecutor issued a non-prosecution order. The case was deemed final. SEC Act S.307 311 313 in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code Criminal Complaint Filed with an