the penalties under Section 296 of the SEA, i.e., up to two years? imprisonment or a fine not exceeding twice the amount of the benefits received or should have been received but in any case no less

(FOCUS), Inter Far East Engineering PLC (IFEC) and The Royal Ceramic Industry PLC (RCI), and Pailin Kumut to six-month imprisonment and a fine of 250,000 baht for conspiring with Sagha in manipulating

for a term of two to five years and a fine from 200,000 baht to 500,000 baht and a further fine not exceeding 10,000 baht for every day during which the contravention continues. The SEC has therefore

failure to comply with, Section 26 and is liable to criminal sanction under Section 66 of the Digital Asset Businesses Emergency Decree, i.e., imprisonment for a term of two to five years and a fine of

Section 289 of the SEA, namely imprisonment for a term of 2 to 5 years and a fine from 200,000 to 500,000 baht, and a further fine not exceeding 10,000 baht for every day during which the contravention

(1) Marnfah Group and (2) Ornpaphat agreed to pay a separate, equal fine of 500,000 baht, while (3) Kanyahorn agreed to pay a fine of 1,530,000 baht. On the contrary, (4) Lederer (Thailand) refused to

sanctions comprise a total fine of 27,398,667 baht (a civil penalty, a compensation in the amount equal to the benefit received or is entitled to be received, and a reimbursement of investigative expenses

Bangkok, 2 December 2016 - The Criminal Fining Committee has imposed a fine of 5,560,000 baht on {A}, a former director of Jasmine International Public Company Limited (JAS), for failing to perform

Section 125 of an imprisonment up to three years or a fine not exceeding 300,000 baht or both and a further fine not exceeding 10,000 baht for every day during which the violation continues. The SEC

-5 years or a fine from 200,000-500,000 baht or both and a further fine not exceeding 10,000 baht for every day during which the violation continues as specified by Section 289 of the SEA. The SEC