misled the public about the price or trading volume of OTO shares and caused the price or trading volume of the securities to deviate from normal market conditions. This case is in the process of inquiry
actions misled the public about the price or trading volume of OTO shares and caused the price or trading volume of the securities to deviate from normal market conditions. This case is in the process of
misled the public about the price or trading volume of OTO shares and caused the price or trading volume of the securities to deviate from normal market conditions. This case is in the process of inquiry
misled the public about the price or trading volume of OTO shares and caused the price or trading volume of the securities to deviate from normal market conditions. This case is in the process of inquiry
actions misled the public about the price or trading volume of OTO shares and caused the price or trading volume of the securities to deviate from normal market conditions. This case is in the process of
misled the public about the price or trading volume of OTO shares and caused the price or trading volume of the securities to deviate from normal market conditions. This case is in the process of inquiry
actions misled the public about the price or trading volume of OTO shares and caused the price or trading volume of the securities to deviate from normal market conditions. This case is in the process of
commit such offense. Consequently, their actions misled the public about the price or trading volume of OTO shares and caused the price or trading volume of the securities to deviate from normal market
the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be. The said actions also caused damage to the company but brought about benefits to Mr
price, which consequently caused damage to RAM primarily worth more than 300 million baht. He also received benefits from other relevant acts. Although he compensated for damages incurred to RAM in